I first published this piece several years ago in the Foreign Service Journal (FSJ), the magazine of the American Foreign Service Association. The FSJ covers foreign affairs from the perspective of foreign service practitioners and their family members and friends in Washington and overseas. It features major and minor foreign policy issues of the day as well as the personal, personnel, and related dimensions of living and working as a US diplomat overseas and domestically. For those contemplating the foreign service as a career (or anyone really), reading the FSJ will help shed light on both the big picture and “nuts and bolts” perspective of what that life might entail. For reference, a link to this month’s FSJ issue is here. Enjoy!
One of my favorite sections of the magazine has always been the “Reflections” column—generally a story, anecdote, or vignette reflecting the offbeat, fun, or unexpected nature of life and work as an American diplomat. Or that of a family member, friend, or bemused observer of the same. For those who have lived the foreign service life or somewhere close to it, you know that diplomats are nothing if not a storehouse of offbeat stories. (Which is why some of us worry about becoming gasbags in the eyes of our critics. Oh well, you can always change the channel). While the initial inspiration for my Substack newsletter was to share some of these stories (mine and those of others1) to a non-foreign service audience, current events have compelled me to pivot in a different direction, for good or ill.
One final note. I was inspired to repost this piece in part because, as a foreign service officer, I was always struck by the degree to which we bent over backwards to accommodate the needs, whims, and desires of our political masters—in all branches of government. The idea that nonpartisan career employees are somehow unpatriotic for failing to adequately support our elected (or selected) political leadership strikes me as totally fanciful and patently false across the board—even if the oath we swear is to the constitution and to nothing or noone else.
For now, back to my true home. The post below has been edited slightly to take into account (the hopefully growing body of) Unbreaking News readers unfamiliar with inside baseball aspects of the foreign service life and profession.
*****
Playing Squash With (or rather Against) Senator Arlen Specter
Word went out from on high that someone from the embassy community was needed to play squash with Senator Arlen Specter, then a Republican from Pennsylvania, who was scheduled to make a brief stop in Guatemala City in early 1996. Wherever the senator happened to travel, whether at home or abroad, someone always was; an hour or so set aside in his schedule for squash was an absolute requirement.
It was non-negotiable.
Washington Post “In the Loop” columnist Al Kamen had even made snarky note of the senator’s disciplined daily squash habit—and the commandeering of partners required to accommodate it. But no matter. The senator was undeterred by mere gossip.
Specter was up and coming at the time. Several years earlier, his aggressive cross-examination of Anita Hill during the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas had thrust him into the national limelight, and he had emerged as a formidable force in the Senate since. “Snarlin’ Arlen” his colleagues reportedly called him.
Treat him right, or watch out!
It seems somehow fitting that I can’t quite recall what official purpose brought Mr. Specter, who was then chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to Guatemala. What I do remember were the embassy’s exhaustive efforts to find him the right squash partner. Should it be someone from inside or outside the mission? Local or American? Was a level of English required, or just a certain threshold of skill at the sport?
This was serious business, and we had to get it right.
*****
Thinking back, I don’t remember how or why I was the one chosen in the end. I’m sure I didn’t exactly volunteer. Probably a combination of the pickings being slim and the first and second choices being out of town that day. I had played squash from time to time some years before as a graduate student, and had held my own against other okay players. But what if the senator was one of the exquisitely skilled, a member of the fearsome squash elite?
What then?
I had had a previous experience with this element, in the form of a thorough thrashing at the hands of a fellow graduate student—the aptly named Angus, from Oxford. I had come to think of myself as pretty decent at squash … until I faced Angus. His dominance of the pivotal T-area was total and complete, his movements on the court focused, economic, and spare.
Angus held the long narrow racket expertly low, parallel to his side and—with a quick succession of barely visible flicks of the wrist—sent the small, hot, black ball spinning with a stunning accuracy and precision of placement just above the red tin and invariably skipping and skidding shallow, fast and far out of my disheveled reach for the easy kill. He couldn’t even try to pretend to keep me in the game. I was a rank amateur playing chess against Bobby Fischer.
It was over before it began.
*****
If Senator Specter was anything like Angus, I thought to myself, I was toast, and the embassy’s reputation for excellence possibly in tatters. I lost some sleep, but kept my crackling doubts locked up inside.
Meanwhile, in the halls of the chancery building that houses the embassy, and over lunch in the cafeteria, conversations turned to strategy. Should I seek to win, or allow the senator to do so? Should I ensure a tough struggle, deliberately drawing it out? Or show unambiguous dominance, to underscore some larger political point? Pluses and minuses were offered on both sides.
The assumptions being made struck me as flawed, deceived by appearances. In my early 30s at the time, I was a good athlete and still in my physical prime. Senator Specter was more than twice my age, and on a different curve in life’s arc entirely; he was not yet stricken by the cancer that felled him years later, but still. Advantage Ludwig, the thinking went.
The point turned out to be moot.
*****
We met in the locker room, minutes before the match was to begin. I was still lacing my tennis shoes when he walked in. I saw an opportunity for an exchange of pleasantries, but the good senator was having none of it. His focus was elsewhere. I’m not even sure we shook hands. I quickly understood that, for him, this episode would be about the squash and the squash alone. Conversation would play no role. Fine.
It turned out to be a legitimate hardscrabble battle, with lots of running and sweating, a succession of momentum shifts, and many tough points fought down to the wire. There was no reason to play it one way or the other, just to play it. Thank God! All told, we were evenly matched. The senator had the advantages of technique, rhythm, and experience, as well as the clear ambition to win; I had speed, stamina, and athleticism on my side.
Let the record show that I was recovering from a chest cold at the time, which caused me to get winded more easily than I might have otherwise done. I had also been away from the courts for a number of years, and was out of practice. As a result, I blew a series of potentially easy kills. Apart from that, for good or ill, Senator Specter beat me fair and square.
Perhaps that’s why he shook my hand before he bid me “adios,” turned, and headed for the showers.
The invitation to contribute to Unbreaking News as a guest remains open. Some of my most viewed posts have been guest posts. All good.
Great story! My first Foreign Service post was Havana, where I arrived in 1995 at the same time with a husband and wife tandem couple who had just finished their first tour in San Salvador. They recounted having to find a squash court that hadn’t been destroyed during the civil war that had ended the year before. The DCM tried to explain to the Senator’s staff the difficulties of finding a squash court and a suitable partner. Apparently Spector’s staff was unmoved. They eventually found a court and the husband in the tandem couple was a brilliant tennis player who was able to transfer those talents to squash. My recollection of the story is that the husband ended up thrashing the Senator. When Spector later switched parties and became a liberal hero I always thought about his selfishness and could never really muster much enthusiasm for him.
Something utterly OT, but I wanted to write it to draw your attention to something. After our conversation the other day about diplomatic skills of Witkoff/Metternich I realised that I had given away my copy of vol 2 of the Penguin Atlas and so I bought it again. I have just received it - the section on the post-Napoleonic re-ordering of the world order is extensive!
I'll repeat my recommendation of the book, I am certain, absolutely certain that you (and your students) will find it very very useful.
The Penguin Atlas of World History: Vol 1 - From the beginning of time to the French Revolution, Vol 2 - From the French Revolution to now.
(Please note, it's an atlas, it has got graphs, charts and maps. If you're expecting a narrative, then you'd better look elsewhere.)